Architecture. Grad School. The State of the Profession. Field Trips. Agony. Ecstasy. Life. Etc.

Architecture Addiction, The Official Blog of

unSchool of Architecture
suggested reading/bookstore
other blogs I like
my portfolio
fieldtrips & workshops*
categories | archives | search
contact | rss

Designing with Technology
by Katy Purviance on 09/17/07 @ 07:40:19 pm
Categories: Class Notes, Observations | 818 words | 1089 views

Professor Ken Carper delivered a whirlwind lecture covering the many aspects of designing with technology, indeed, he says, everything that has been made has been done so using technology. He points out that technology resolves the conflict between man and nature. We do not live out in the wilderness thinking that everything is peachy keen. No. We are cold. Hungry. Naked. With technology, we can change all that and build countless McMansions and spend one seventh of our lives stuck in rush hour traffic behind a car beriddled with non-clever bumper stickers. This, we say, is progress, and we have technology to thank for it.

The architectural manifestation of technology is structure, which is the sculpture of the utilitarian world. Structure has three purposes:

1. Connecting two point, as in a bridge
2. Withstanding natural forces, as in a dam
3. Spanning and enclosing space, as in buildings.

Of course, further conflict arises between the vertical forces of nature and the horizontal dynamics of mankind. A properly-designed structural system will solve this conflict.

Gravity v. Mankind

So, you’re probably asking yourself, What kinds of structure technologies are there? The Professor listed these:

Structural Engineering
Forensic Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Communications Systems Engineering
Materials Engineering
Conveying Systems Engineering
Fire Protection Engineering
Construction Process Technology

As successful design necessitates the creative integration technology and the creative resolution of conflicts, all of these technologies are apparently required.

There are a few points I’d like to make:

1. “You can shove thousands of people into the bowels of a building and just use equipment to keep everyone comfortable – using a hell of a lot of energy!”

Glass House

Good point, Professor. Before the technological advances that led to the widespread use of AC units, fluorescent lighting, and other such modern luxuries, architects ensured that future occupants had enough light by including – get this – lots of windows in their designs. It was an art and a science to design a building according to the position of the sun such that it might take full advantage of the winter sun and yet be shaded come summer. These buildings relied on the mass of masonry to provide stable thermal conditions. Buildings were designed according to the bounty and rhythm of nature. It was a simpler, happier time in which people used their minds. Now, thanks to the advent of HVAC technologies and artificial lighting, architects and planners may plop buildings down any which way, orientation be damned. These devil-may-care buildings create a great sucking sound on our natural resources, necessitating the import of foreign energy. When we cannot get these things cheaply, we simply go to war. We take whatever we want because we think we are more special than any other nation on Earth. This is the American Way.

2. “The most important thing you can bring to the design team is to hate ugly, poorly-integrated buildings.”

Modern soulless landscape, with smog

Again, good point, Professor. As I said above, yes, we have the technology to do whatever the hell we please. Not as well known, however, is the oft-denied fact that we, as human beings, also require beauty for optimal health and well-being (or, translated into American, for optimal productivity levels). We need buildings in which to live and work that are, by the very nature of their well-integrated designs, an Eden-esque expression of vitality. We have the sun and the moon and the seasons for a reason; let us work with them, not against them.

3. Once there was a grasshopper who spent summer and fall lounging around, teasing the hard-working ants. When winter came, the ants feasted, but the grasshopper froze to death.
Instead of freezing to death, however, the moral of our story will concern paying four dollars for a gallon of gas. Let this jovial children’s fable serve as a warning to those who expect unprecedented levels of comfort instantly, at the expense of smaller, darker, harder-working peoples. Just because, as the Professor writes, “it has become possible to ignore the natural context in the design of structures,” does not mean that it would be prudent to do so. Indeed, we are a nation of fools digging our own graves.

Feel like breathing fresh air?

But there is hope. People are waking up. People are saying to themselves, “Gee, perhaps we are a nation of fools digging our own graves.” They are looking for something new, and that something new is actually something very old. The are looking at something the profession is calling “appropriate technology.” Appropriate technology means basing architecture and community settlement patterns on rational natural principles. People are now thinking that it’d be real nice to breathe real air and to feel real sunlight on their skin, which is good because one must get at least twenty minutes of sunlight a day in order to make sufficient levels of vitamin D, which regulates mood and other nice brain functions. No wonder so many people are mentally ill.

Bookmark and Share Send Feedback | Permalink


No Pingbacks for this post yet...

Previous post: Environmental Gerontology
Next post: Perception of Place and the Effects of Design on Well-being

our sponsors
Other Blogs I Like
GSD Blogs:
Ben in Paris
A Large Lumpy Rock
Wayfinding with Waxman
Other Blogs:
Saved By Design
Jetson Green
Core 77
Rammed Earth is for Everyone
Raw Design Build
Lloyd Kahn's blog
Form Follows You Home
Burning Down the House - Radio Architecture
Unhappy Hipsters
Design Vote
Truly Minimal Plan
December 2017
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 << <   > >>
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30


Me on Burning Down the House
The VERB School
August 18 2010

October 20 2010

Licensure in the USA
November 17 2010

Become One of Us...Subscribe to Architecture Addiction
Give the gift of an architecture book to Architecture Addiction
Radio Architecture
Listen live to Burning Down the House, Wednesdays 4PT/7ET
Or download the podcasts from iTunes

our sponsors
It's Finally Here
unSchool of Architecture is here. Enter your name and email below to learn more.

Architecture School Survey
Hi. My name is Katy. I like it when you write to me and tell me about the cool stuff you're doing in architecture. Yes, I write back.* I may publish your letter and my reply on the blog. If you don't want me to do that, you can just ask that I withhold your name, or if you're really serious about keeping your letter a secret, you can ask me to just not publish it at all. Of course I'll still write back to you. * I hope you'll take this opportunity to share your thoughts with our worldwide audience.

[Fields marked (*) are required]


Your Name:*

Your Email Address:*

Your Question or Suggestion:*

After you click Submit, you'll come right back to the blog!

* Unless you spam me.

Created by Contact Form Generator

places where you could probably learn more about designing and building in just a few days than I did after a year of grad school

Know of some others I can add here? Let me know. Have you already visited some of these places...or planning on it? Let me know and I will feature your story and your photos here!

I am starting a new kind of architecture school. Unlike most architecture schools, you wouldn't have to submit GRE scores or good grades or letters of recommendation. You wouldn't have to put the rest of your life on hold for 3 to 5 years. You wouldn't have to accrue tens of thousands of dollars in debt. At my architecture school, anyone could come for a few weeks and learn how to build a house with their own two hands. My teachers would take skills and concepts from some of these other workshops I've listed above... except classes would be held year-round to make it easy to fit into your schedule. I would have a number of different campuses around the country that would teach building designs appropriate to the local climate. And I need your help. Can you donate land for a campus? Can you dotate books for a library? Can you teach a workshop? Can you provide start-up capital? Let me know.

suggested reading/bookstore

Need more? Visit our bookstore

where is everybody?
Locations of visitors to this page

Who's Online Now?

  • Guest Users: 19
random quote generator

Give me another

our sponsors