Architecture Addiction, The Official Blog of

Randy Bright of the Tulsa Beacon wrote this article, “Engineering utopia with architecture.”

As I was about to file away one of the many newsletters I receive, my eye caught the headline, “First LEED and Now SEED..

LEED, of course, means Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design, or “green” design. SEED stands for “Social Economic Environmental Design Network.”

SEED is a relatively new organization formed in 2006 that is gaining in popularity and membership among architects, planners, developers and others. It is new enough that there is scant information that can be found on the Internet, but I found enough to begin to see what it is about.

One article I found on the AIA (American Institute of Architects) website was written by Laura Kreeger Neil, who was a member of SEED. It was unclear from the article if she was an architect or not, but her definition of SEED was that it was “a group of individuals and organizations committed to advancing the right of every person to live in a socially, economically, and environmentally healthy community.”

According to Neil, the mission of SEED is to “increase the relevancy of the building environment,” and their guiding principles are as follows:

1. Advocate with those that have a limited voice in public life.

2. Build structures for inclusion that engage stakeholders and allow communities to make decisions.

3. Promote social equality through discourse that reflects a range of values and social identities.

4. Generate ideas that grow from place and build local capacity.

5. Believe that a community’s design should help conserve resources and minimize waste.

A workshop was held in Dallas in January of 2008 by SEED, who produced a promotional flyer that stated that the group that founded SEED had originally met in 2005 to determine how to change “societal conceptions of the built environment.” The flyer also stated that “the way in which we build must be reevaluated to provide all individuals with healthy, sustainable living communities.”

One of the speakers at the workshop was Jeff Speck, who was a city planner who had previously worked as the Director of Town Planning for the firm of Duany Plater-Zyberk and Company. Andres Duany is a planner that I have written about in previous columns and who is the guru of New Urbanism.

As I read a blog posted by one of the attendees of the workshop, the purpose of SEED became a little clearer, that is, if you consider the thoughts of this very enthused “SEEDling” (his term, not mine) to be an indicator of what it is all about.

He wrote that he had felt the momentum “towards creating a tool for evaluating real estate development projects that would have real value in advancing social justice and community development” and that projects could be evaluated on a point system whereby affordable housing would be given a “very high national need score.”

He continued, “this would allow developers of affordable housing projects to argue against NIMBY (not in my back yard) opposition to affordable housing projects by citing the national necessity and citing SEED as a system that fairly shares this burden across communities.”

Later he suggested that “community approval does not strike me as a good benchmark for SEED to use.”

In other words, if a developer wants to build low-income housing in middle or upper income housing areas, those communities should not have the right to object on the grounds that low income housing would affect their home values.

He continued, “Challenging some forms of community opposition could be an opportunity for SEED developers to challenge NIMBYism.”

Though I could find nothing on the Internet that proved a direct link between SEED and the United Nations, it seems a bit coincidental that at the U.N.’s Johannesburg Summit in 2002 they broadened their view of sustainable development to include the concepts of society, environment and economy.

And on UNESCO’s website (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization), you will find that there is a 10-year plan (2005-2014) for an education that will “encourage changes in behavior that will create a more sustainable future in terms of environmental integrity, economic viability, and a just society for present and future generations.”

Source

So it looks like there’s ONE smart state out there.

HONOLULU - All new homes in Hawaii will be required to have solar water heaters installed starting in 2010 under a law approved by the Legislature.

Hawaii becomes the first state requiring the energy-saving systems in homes.

Solar water heaters typically cost home buyers about $5,000 extra on their mortgage, but island residents will save thousands of dollars over the years on their electricity bills, supporters said.

Why did they do this? I LOVE Representative Hermina Morita’s answer:

“We owe to our children and grandchildren the promise of a clean and renewable energy future,” said Rep. Hermina Morita, chairwoman of the House Energy Committee. “A solar water heater mandate in new home construction … will result in greater public benefits to everyone at large.”

Oh yes, and it SAVES MONEY.

Solar water heaters reduce residents’ electricity costs between 30 percent and 35 percent — up to $150 per month for a family of four on Kauai, said Morita, D-Hanalei-Kapaa. With those kind of savings, their initial expense is usually paid off in three to four-and-a-half years.

AND it’s the responsible thing to do.

Lawmakers described a government requirement for solar water heaters as a way to protect the environment, reduce Hawaii’s heavy reliance on foreign energy sources and save money.

So let this be a message to the 49 feet draggers out there.

“There are significant and quantifiable environmental benefits, energy security benefits and economic development benefits,” said Sen. Gary Hooser, D-Kauai-Niihau. “This measure lowers the net cost of home ownership and will cost nothing in terms of the state budget to implement.”

Source