Architecture Addiction, The Official Blog of

I just read this article in Natural Home Magazine (dot com) by Rebecca Selove about harvesting rainwater.

I know this has become kinda trendy over the past few years what with everybody suddenly caring about the environment and everything. What I don’t get is why this once-common practice went away for so long. And why (and how!) people became disconnected from the most basic idea of survival: collect and protect the water.

Here’s the article:

Our home is a rainwater harvesting tool. The roof was designed to capture 1200 gallons of water each time it rains an inch. The LEED rating system gives us four points for doing this, which is a pretty big pat on the back for reducing our dependence on the municipal water system. Our county’s building codes do not allow us to use that valuable rainwater for washing clothes or flushing our toilet, which we wanted to do. It will go to good use, nonetheless, for irrigating vegetables and blueberry bushes, and for hydrating a few cows and maybe some sheep.

We don’t yet know where we will store the water. We’d hoped to find a bargain of a water tank a little town had outgrown, maybe a quaint round metal tower surrounded beautiful wood. That hasn’t happened yet, so we are looking at polyurethane, concrete and metal cisterns, either above or below ground.

I believe that rainwater harvesting is good, and I also think that most cisterns are not very attractive. I think that we will use more resources if we dig a hole in the ground big enough to hold a 1700-gallon tank, which is what we have been told is our minimum, rather than plopping a 5 foot high green plastic tub beside our screened porch. As with many aspects of building a sustainable home, our decisions are affected by facts and our feelings.

We have gotten information about local contractors from our friend Gwen Griffith, Program Director of the Cumberland River Compact, and from Ronnie Barron, our local County Extension Agent. He has also provided some useful facts, such as these:

• It takes approximately 27,000 gallons of water to supply 1 inch of irrigation to 1 acre. Most commercial vegetable growers try to supply at least 1 inch per acre per seven to 10 days.

• Growing calves will consume about 5-15 gallons of water per day (depending on their size).

In evaluating our options, we are asking where and how the cistern is made, how durable will it be and what impact installation will have in the short- and long-term. Whether we bury it on a gravel bed or stand it above ground on a concrete pad, we’ll be using heavy equipment and hauling resources from off-site. It seems to me that over and over again we put our values on either side of a giant scale, weigh our options, and hope our final decision satisfies us for a long, long time.

I wonder how the facts will affect my perception of what is attractive.

So I’m cleaning out my backpack for my trip to Washington tomorrow, and I came across this ad I had torn out of a magazine who knows how long ago.

It’s an ad for USAarchitecture.com. They “specialize in connecting buyers and sellers of architecturally unique homes.”

Let’s have a look, shall we?

Oh…actually, there’s nothing on that site that’s really that interesting.

All the houses are in Arizona. Don’t get me wrong. I love Arizona. It’s just that…well, how can you call yourself “USA” architecture if you only represent one state?

Another disappointment: Nothing really looked that “architecturally unique.” Especially since all of these homes have the same look to them. In fact, instead of “architecturally unique,” I would put these houses in the “post-post-modernism” (neo-ugly?) category.

Quelle dommage.